MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: Which Web Host Is Best for Your Business?

Securing an optimal location for a physical store is a well-established strategy to enhance visibility and get new customers. In the same way, your web hosting provider in the UK impacts the visibility, speed, and accessibility of your website, both in the UK and globally.

Therefore, choosing the most suitable web hosting services is a strategic choice in the advancement of your business. A frequently raised question is: why does the strategic focus of a hosting provider hold such significance?

The outlying answer is equally simple: “performance”. From reliability and data security to consistent uptime and future scalability, a company’s hosting service determines a website’s performance metrics, all of which are directly dependent on available resources from the host.

This blog provides the most comprehensive information comparing the best-known UK web hosting providers in the industry, MilesWeb and SiteGround. We will look at their ideology targets on infrastructure and storage, pricing, and value. Our objective is to find which service provider is capable of meeting your UK business targets.

So, let’s move forward and find out: Is MilesWeb the best alternative to SiteGround?

All about MilesWeb

What is MilesWeb? MilesWeb is one of the best managed web hosting providers, an Indian web hosting company founded in 2012. With over a decade in the industry, MilesWeb has earned a reputation for providing complete and customisable hosting services to companies of all types and sizes. They provide services that include shared hosting and VPS, cloud and dedicated servers, and even enterprise-grade hosting solutions designed for focused industries.

What makes MilesWeb different is the consistent reliability it delivers for its pricing and overall performance. The company promises a 99.9% uptime guarantee while providing 24/7 expert support to ensure minimal disruption and maximum satisfaction. Having over a million websites hosted globally, MilesWeb has emerged as a preferred UK hosting provider for users looking for budget-friendly and reliable hosting services. These same advantages position MilesWeb as a strong competitor to SiteGround.

All about SiteGround

SiteGround is a popular name in the global hosting market since it offers a wide range of hosting services, from shared to cloud to reseller hosting. Founded in 2004 and headquartered in Bulgaria, their infrastructure is powered by Google Cloud and is particularly known for their performance-focused hosting. SiteGround claims that their servers use SuperCacher and Free CDN, along with advanced control panel systems, to improve speed and reliability.

SiteGround focuses on performance and security, which incurs an additional cost—suitable for companies that prioritise speed and are willing to spend. But the higher renewal rates are burdensome for users with restricted budgets.

MilesWeb Vs. SiteGround: Services Overview

– MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: Uptime and Efficiency

MilesWeb combines NVMe SSD storage, LiteSpeed web servers, and LSCache to optimise content delivery and server response time. This NVMe tech stack-supported infrastructure minimises latency and accelerates website load times, which is highly beneficial for UK businesses looking to maintain operational performance at scale.

On the other hand, StandGround relies on the infrastructure of Google Cloud in alliance with SSD storage and their SuperCacher. While StandGround performs reasonably well, they do not use NVMe and LiteSpeed by default, meaning there is a capped ceiling provided with their proprietary technologies. Therefore, performance will always be a cliff below the consistent performance plateau achieved with MilesWeb’s configuration.

Both MilesWeb and SiteGround have a reputation for hosting but have slightly different areas they aim to optimise for in terms of performance relative to cost. 

– MilesWeb vs SiteGround: Performance Comparison

– MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: Prices and Plans

MilesWeb’s offerings include shared, VPS, cloud, and reseller hosting, all provided at straightforward, economical pricing. Their pricing model is crafted with tangible clarity to avoid hidden costs and steep renewal increases. Customers receive great value without the stress of surprise expenses with free SSL, website migration, email accounts, backups, and other features included in most plans. 

SiteGround is well known for their performance and customer service; however, they do sit on the higher end for pricing. Their introductory offers tend to be quite appealing but significantly increase in price after the initial billing cycle. Features like on-demand backups, priority support, and others tend to add up on higher-tier plans or extra costs, which leads to paying more overall. 

– MilesWeb vs SiteGround: Plans Comparison

– MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: Customer Assistance

MilesWeb offers 24/7 customer support via live chat or emails. Their experienced support team is helpful, knowledgeable, and quick to solve customer issues. One of the most impressive parts is the responsive support, which entirely changes the scope for customers.

SiteGround also supports live chat and ticketing systems for round-the-clock assistance but no longer offers direct phone support. Their support staff is known for resolving issues quickly and effectively, but priority service is restricted to those paying for premium tiers. Moreover, SiteGround offers support only in English, which can be limiting for non-English-speaking customers.

– MilesWeb vs SiteGround: Customer Support Comparison

– MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: Services Offered

MilesWeb and SiteGround offer a full range of hosting services to suit any user’s specific requirements, from novices creating personal web pages to businesses needing complex and resource-intensive systems. 

MilesWeb’s customisable offerings, like GPU hosting, Forex VPS, and numerous managed VPS (Windows, cPanel VPS, CyberPanel, Plesk), set it apart from competitors. Furthermore, these advanced services are backed by competitive prices and a straightforward dashboard, which benefits both new startups and experienced developers. 

Despite being a frontrunner for managed WordPress hosting, SiteGround continues to focus on shared and cloud hosting. While WordPress optimisation and speed are their forte, and they are endorsed by WordPress.org, they don’t offer specialised services like GPU hosting or Windows-based VPS, making them less adaptable to complex server setups.

– MilesWeb vs SiteGround: Services Comparison

MilesWeb vs. SiteGround: AI Website Builder Tool

MilesWeb is equipped with AI tools that allow users to build a website in a matter of minutes without requiring any technical know-how. 

The AI Website Builder offered by MilesWeb is super affordable, as it goes for only ₹199/month. For those bundling it with hosting, the starting price drops to Approximately £1.00/month. This is great for freelancers and small business owners. Moreover, it comes with no other charges over the basic plan and includes industry-level features like SEO, fully customisable responsive templates, and a lot more.

On the contrary, SiteGround offers a simple site-building plan that incorporates Site Tools + WordPress + Starter Wizard. While convenient for users and well-optimised for performance, SiteGround lacks an AI-driven builder. They primarily depend on WordPress-based options, which means there’s minimal AI integration for customisation unless third-party tools like Elementor or Divi are added.

– MilesWeb vs SiteGround: Website Builder Plan

MilesWeb vs. SiteGround : Pros and Cons

Pros of Choosing MilesWeb

1. Always-Available Support

MilesWeb has received numerous testimonials commending its 24/7 support staff for timely assistance via live chat or email. Help is proactive and responsive. 

2. Feature-Rich Hosting Bundles

MilesWeb’s annual plans comprise of complimentary domain registration, site migration, SSL certificates, and even daily backups. These features relieve frequent initial user challenges and maximise user value from day one. 

3. Extensive Hosting Portfolio

MilesWeb has over 70 hosting variations that range from shared hosting to GPU-dedicated servers and cloud-based VPS hosting. Every blogger, developer, or fintech startup has a customised plan suited to their specific use case. 

4. High-Performance Stack

MilesWeb uses NVMe SSDs, LiteSpeed servers, and LSCache, resulting in fast load times for heavy data sites. Their GPUs are able to support workloads of basic AI, 3D rendering, trading platforms, and many more.

Cons of Choosing MilesWeb 

Advanced configurations may come with a learning curve. New users with power-packed GPUs and Forex VPS hosting might find these options a bit overwhelming. However, the MilesWeb team bridges that gap with guided support and helpful documentation.

Pros of Choosing SiteGround 

1. Specific to WordPress

Everyone knows how SiteGround ’s hosting stack is specially tailored for WordPress. Staging areas, auto-updates, and managed security are just a few of the many features that are included. It is a favourite of developers and businesses that create WordPress-powered sites.

2. Advanced Speed Features

With SiteGround, loading pages is quick, even without personal optimisation. For SiteGround users, Google Cloud infrastructure, Ultrafast PHP, and integrated caching features work in unison to guarantee quick loading speeds.

3. Excellent Security Standards

The framework of SiteGround is built around reliability and security, and this is apparent with the features included, like AI threat detection, daily backups, and individual firewalls.

Cons of Choosing SiteGround 

1. High Price

The hosting services provided by SiteGround are decent but cost a lot more than competitors. In comparison to MilesWeb, SiteGround has lower resource limits, especially on lower-tier plans. Additionally, SSD storage is very limited.

2. Lack of Custom Hosting Services

Despite gigantic improvements in WordPress hosting services, SiteGround lacks dedicated services like Forex-powered GPUs and customisable VPS plans that users who prioritise performance demand.